• Małżeństwa tego typu nie były niczym niezwykłym w średniowieczu (i wcześniej), Jadwigę Andegaweńską zaręczono w kolebce z Wilhelmem, wydano za Jagiełłę w wieku lat ok. 12 i małżeństwo skonsumowano. Matkę angielskiego Henryka VII Małgorzatę de Beaufort wydano za mąż w wieku lat 12, mimo że była jeszcze bardzo słabo rozwinięta, urodziła w wieku lat 13-stu, z wielkim trudem i paskudnymi konsekwencjami, nie mogła mieć więcej dzieci. Prawo kościelne w Anglii od XIII w. pozwalało na zawieranie małżeństwa od lat 7, wydawanie za mąż 9-cio i 10-latek nie było do końca XVIII w. niczym niezwykłym zarówno tam jak i w amerykańskich koloniach.

    Francuska Konstytucja Rewolucyjna z 1791 r. ustaliła dolną granicę wieku na 11 lat. W tym samym czasie w Portugalii, Szwajcarii, Danii i Hiszpanii za prawnie zdolne do małżeństwa i seksu uznawano dzieci (czyt. dziewczęta) w wieku lat 10 do 12. Gdy jako niewinne dziecię usłyszałem od księdza na lekcji religii, że Maryja zadziwiona pytała anioła Gabriela jak może być w ciąży skoro „męża nie zna”, nie mogłem pomiary wentylacji Warszawa  się nadziwić, jak można nie znać własnego męża. Później dopiero zrozumiałem „znanie” w sensie biblijnym. Wg. N. Testamentu i ks. Rydzyka Maryja jest wiecznie dziewicą, czyli Józef był OK. Co innego niejaki Pantera, rzymski legionista pochodzenia syryjskiego, który podobno był prawdziwym autorem cudownego poczęcia z 13-latką. Ale w tamtych czasach to była normalka. Dużo później właściwie też – w edwardiańskim Londynie, niewiele ponad 100 lat temu można było kupić świeżą 10-latkę za parę funtów, a w branży kobiet pracujących działało co najmniej kilkaset dziewcząt w zbliżonym wieku.


    votre commentaire
  • Z opublikowanego właśnie raportu SIPRI wynika, że w latach 2011–15 największymi eksporterami broni były następujące kraje (w nawiasach podano największych odbiorców):

    1. Stany Zjednoczone (Arabia Saudyjska, Zjednoczone Emiraty Arabskie, Turcja)

    2. Rosja (Indie, Chiny, Wietnam)

    3. Chiny (Pakistan, Bangladesz, Birma)

    4. Francja (Maroko, Chiny, Egipt)

    5. Niemcy (USA, Izrael, Grecja)

    6. Wielka Brytania (Arabia Saudyjska, Indie, Indonezja)

    7. Hiszpania (Australia, Arabia Sudyjska, Turcja)

    8. Włochy (Zjednoczone Emiraty Arabskie, Indie, Turcja)

    9. Ukraina (Chiny, Rosja, Etiopia)

    10. Holandia (Maroko, Jordania, USA

    Zbrojenia Chin i Rosji nieuchronnie prowadzą do rywalizacji między tymi krajami o panowanie w Azji. Już obecnie PKB Chin jest 5 razy wyższy niż Rosji, a różnica ta będzie się powiększać, gdyż Rosja przeżywa załamanie gospodarcze. Rosja obecnie góruje nad Chinami wielkością potencjału broni nuklearnej, ale w najbliższych latach ta przewaga może zaniknąć. GDP PPP Chin to jest obecnie 18,088,054 mln dolarów a Rosji 3,576,841 mln dolarów – różnica rzeczywiście pięciokrotna, ale pod względem per capita to Chiny mają wciąż tylko nieco ponad połowę dochodu Rosji (13,224 dolarów vs 24,449 dolarów). Poza tym, to Rosja ma dziś wystarczającą ilość bomb jądrowych i środków ich przenoszenia aby nie obawiać się Chin, z którymi zresztą Rosja ma od dawna zbieżne interesy. Problem jest zaś wzrost potencjału militarnego Indii, co musi pociągnąć za sobą nuklearny konflikt z Pakistanem. Wiadomo, że Indie wygrają wojnę z Pakistanem, ale jakim kosztem? czyżby? PKB Rosji w 2015 r. obniżył się o blisko 4% w porównaniu z rokiem ubiegłym, a wartość eksportu spadła o 40% z powodu niskich cen ropy naftowej i gazu. W tym czasie większość krajów UE zanotowała wzrost gospodarczy. Również pomyślnie rozwija się gospodarka USA. Co do Indii, jest to jeszcze kraj na dorobku, o niskiej stopie życiowej, ale już ich PKB jest 2-krotnie wyższy niż Rosji. Na razie potencjał atomowy Indii jest za słaby, aby mierzyć się z czołowymi potęgami świata. Moim zdaniem nie chodzi Chinom o militarne podboje, gdyż gospodarczo czynią to skuteczniej i bez strat ludzkich. Chodzi raczej o to, by mieć za sobą silną armie, kiedy zażądają od swych odbiorców czegoś konkretnego w zamian za dolary, które obecnie przyjmują za towar lub gdy odmówią dalszych dostaw za bezwartościowe papierki.

    Znalezione obrazy dla zapytania wyścig zbrojeń

    Poza tym, to załamanie gospodarcze obserwujemy dziś głównie na Zachodzie, a nie w Rosji.Według IMF (imf.org/external/pubs/ft/weo/2015/update/02/) dynamika PKB w roku 2015 wynosiła: India 7.5%, Chiny 6.8%, USA 2.5%, UE 1.5%, Niemcy 1.6%, Kanada 1.5% Francja 1.2%, Japonia 0.8%, Italia 0.7%, Brazylia -1.5% a Rosja -3.4%. Tak więc PKB Rosji spadło nie o około 4% jak twierdzisz, a o około 3% i ten spadek nie wygląda wcale źle w porównaniu do stagnacji na tzw. Zachodzie. PKB per capita Indii, najszybszej rozwijającej się dziś escape room Warszawa gospodarki świata jest zaś bardzo niski (1688 dolarów, czyli 3% PKB per capita USA, 13% PKB per capita Polski i ok. 20% PKB per capita Rosji – w dolarach porównywalnych czyli PPP jest to nieco lepiej, ale wciąż wręcz tragicznie). Skandalem jest wręcz że kraj taki jak India, czyli który nie potrafi zapewnić dachu nad głową i odpowiedniego pożywienia setkom milionów swoich obywateli, wydaje co roku około 50 mld dolarów na zupełnie mu zbędne zbrojenia.  


    votre commentaire
  • Islamist and his wife made a massacre in San Bernardino. Apple refuses to defend the rights of its clients. At stake in this test of power is something more than the result of the investigation. Each entry is to break as it is close to an infinite number of attempts. The trick is that to solve the data is destroyed after a nine-failure to enter a password. And so this is a system of almost 100% -wo safe also against the manufacturer. I do not understand completely what these grievances. Nowhere is no clear definition, let alone the laws that determine whether journalism is what it should be, what should not, and what can not. Texts (may be neutral, can be a pro, they may be against it, may be flattering, may be malignant, and so on. And so they are.

    Znalezione obrazy dla zapytania apple

    In principle, however, there is a fairly strict definition of the word "insult" and do not see the connection of this definition with the statement in the text called "open confrontation Apple and image will gain more." Of course, this is not a flattering opinion about the morality of the company, but first, the morality in business is a contradiction, on the other hand, there are few companies the size of Apple, which so admirably mastered the art of "shaving" of their followers (yes, deliberately selected unflattering word although I do not think that it was an "insult"). Apple's goals and has a great sense of what it pays. Part of this sense is the recent decision on this unfortunate phone. By the way, they found themselves in an interesting, though highly risky situation. They lift up with "their" government, in addition to the government of the most powerful (for now) country in the world, and no government does not like. And as he does not like it ... things can come up with (PiS government is no exception, for it;). Eg. A more strictly enforce tax laws, environmental, import ... stick always find - and it could cost the company billions. And all dlatgo (now would be "an insult") that the company is very, very consciously taken this decision, sensing a rat and including the CHIC STYLE - "anti-establishment", anti-spy, any-violation-privacy, etc. Of course, it all kind of such anti beginning and ending at MASS aCTION - on fejsbuku, so the establishment can sleep peacefully, the times when the action on fejsbuku did wonders and lead to solutions to escape room problems that "could not be solved" - gone. No, but it does not matter are the facts, it is important to the perception of users who feel invigorating Telling rebellion, and supports them after their Elder Brother - Apple. I'm curious (attention, cynicism), if the company is to pay, ie. The wave and anti-high, and will erode very quickly. For now, Apple is increasing and on it goes, to the satisfaction of investors. Nb, it was also an insult at the company, but only from the point of view of morality, because from the point of view of investors, Apple should be applauded, if not cheers.

    Create any gates deprives the entire solution meaning and quintessential stock.

    I personally think that the manufacturer was right, and I'm on his side. And the fact that some services require the manufacturer to leave the security systems of any holes indicates the worst of these services and the progress in the development of civilization Orwellian.

    The first is the slogan that makes me less interested

    The second is the unpleasant, denunciatory tone and insinuating article.

    Is journalism is based on information or on throwing insults

    that "open confrontation Apple and image gain more."

    Apple could have, maybe not right but is it a reason to discredit a public company? Apple does not hate but it's my business. Forgive me, but it's hard for nuances when you have 5 lines to write.

    I want and I must point out that long passed me the desire to show his worth at the expense of malice against writers. If I criticize it means that I require from you more. I care more on the quality of journalism and not showing who knows better and adventures. Keep your level and do not be reduced to normal today.


    votre commentaire
  • XX

    ,, But colonialism ended in XIX century, changed only the face, but continues today! "Very good point - Poland will of ruling the country since 1989 has also been harnessed to postcolonial car, taking her belonging place a horse (for a total workhorse - but the ox did not fit into the car). Just as it has been since the middle of the XVI century, when we were suppliers of goods simple, but require huge amounts of labor? Does this mean that we have the moral right to kill the maximum number of Germans for example. Berlin metro? Because Germany is the main colonizer (there are even some who clearly talking about ,, condominium "... he, he.)? Is it because France is sucking capital out of our country (and does so at power), we have the right to liquidate up to a large randomly selected group of Frenchmen? Is it because they negatively judge the US policy of slaughter I first encountered American? I thought that speech ,, D. Cameron of Poles benefits Phishing "is racist insult - or should kill any number of Englishmen to repay him ,, humiliation"? But Islamism was and is jaknajbardziej directed against local rulers. Born in Egypt, he fought with sekularnymi governments Nasser took power after bakructwie (economic and political) and was aimed at the seizure of power and to introduce some version of the system based on Islam, but a whole lot smoother than the latest versions served by IS. This is only bin Laden, after the experiences of Afghan and successes supported and financed by the United States Mubarak in the extermination of Islamists (better not to ask what methods) first radicalized to reaching the writings of Ibn Tammiyi and jurisprudence Hanbalitów (version Wahhabi), and secondly he began to preach the need for " cut off the serpent's head "that the US, instead of tails - Middle East tyrants on the American leash. If I were spiskologiem I would be convinced that Washington performs his plans - overthrowing Saddam, Gaddafi and Assad.

    So match - a revolt against the rulers and their sponsors and making systemic upheaval.

     

    It was about the Nazis murdered MAXIMUM (preferably all) Jews and Roma. Then in the queue for steel depletion of the Slavs. In that Islamists they are similar to the Nazis: they is not about killing soldiers ,, Frankish "(which would be rational and sensible) - the terms of murder in a maximum of spectacular up large, randomly selected group of people - the non-Muslims.

    Not really. The Nazis were genocide ideology. Islamists. Yes, they kill in a spectacular, dramatic and provocative way up, but it is a means to intimidate both opponents and subjects, and not an end like a Nazi. I would recommend http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2015/nov/15/terrorists-isis

    Naming Islamism "Islamofascism" is nonsense propaganda aimed at first to cure spinal moral western społeczeńst, second demonization of the enemy, thirdly, convinced voters that they can not concede one iota, and that the ills of the blame Islamists can not be addressed in any other way except bombs.

    Is it because they negatively judge the US policy of slaughter I first encountered American?

    It depends on the chipset. Poles do not abstain from terrorism in the Russian zone in the years 1864 - 1914, szlachtując quite a few Russians, as well as in the years 1939-1945.


    votre commentaire
  • Despite rational arguments and out of similar circumstances (role of colonialism, neokolonialzm, though here I believe that much exaggerated, the effects of the creation of Israel, the devastating impact of the invasion of Iraq in 2003) finally come to completely different conclusions.

    You write: Islamism (Wahhabism, Salafism) is a revolution. The problem is that usually the revolution lies at the root of diagnosis: guilty misery is the king or his advisers, the bourgeoisie or ,, leftists "and according to these conclusions revolutionaries attempt (often physical) liquidation selected, which are considered harmful to groups of people. It is usually is a certain group of people. So much theory. Usually it degenerates into a mass murder like. Bolshevik Revolution. The only revolution, which in my opinion is connectivity described by you ,, Islamic revolution "is the National Socialist revolution in Germany. Its goal after liquidation ,, ",, traditional" (acc. Wzmiankowanej my diagnosis) was the extermination of enemies to the maximum extent other people. It was about the Nazis murdered MAXIMUM (preferably all) Jews and Roma. Then in the queue for steel depletion of the Slavs. In that Islamists are similar to the Nazis: they is not about killing soldiers ,, Frankish "(which would be rational and sensible) - the terms of murder in a maximum of spectacular up large, randomly selected group of people - the non-Muslims. And just like Nazism (Unlike the Bolsheviks, who, however, had a positive purpose ,, "- ,, creating a fair system," etc. cliches) Islamism is nihilism. He does not offer (unlike for example. Bolshevism) any real purpose. It has to implement, disturbed. irrational goals, phantasmagoria ,, pure Islam, "as he professed by you emphasize group of people (what else push 99% of Muslims are peace-loving people). Like Weltanschaung the NSDAP was only a reflection of the artistic and racist phantasmagoria Hitler. The question arises: how are we to defend themselves? Before Hitler, it was necessary to defend killing a lot of Germans - and also those of 99% ,, peace-loving ".

    The question is whether aid to these people (refugees ,, "), often hostile to our values ​​or total negującym it is worth the freedom WHICH WE WE ARE THE depriving. Is it because of your proverbial ,, 1%" (the bad guys - ,, revolutionaries'), we have to settle for surveillance of, monitoring, etc. Even the security procedures at airports are annoying enough. What's next: checks at train stations? subway stations? Bus stops? It can control every ,, olive guy, "but it will be racism, after all? If it has to be - I thank you for those ,, 99% "good - I prefer that they did not exist in Europe.


    votre commentaire



    Suivre le flux RSS des articles
    Suivre le flux RSS des commentaires