• Islamist and his wife made a massacre in San Bernardino. Apple refuses to defend the rights of its clients. At stake in this test of power is something more than the result of the investigation. Each entry is to break as it is close to an infinite number of attempts. The trick is that to solve the data is destroyed after a nine-failure to enter a password. And so this is a system of almost 100% -wo safe also against the manufacturer. I do not understand completely what these grievances. Nowhere is no clear definition, let alone the laws that determine whether journalism is what it should be, what should not, and what can not. Texts (may be neutral, can be a pro, they may be against it, may be flattering, may be malignant, and so on. And so they are.

    Znalezione obrazy dla zapytania apple

    In principle, however, there is a fairly strict definition of the word "insult" and do not see the connection of this definition with the statement in the text called "open confrontation Apple and image will gain more." Of course, this is not a flattering opinion about the morality of the company, but first, the morality in business is a contradiction, on the other hand, there are few companies the size of Apple, which so admirably mastered the art of "shaving" of their followers (yes, deliberately selected unflattering word although I do not think that it was an "insult"). Apple's goals and has a great sense of what it pays. Part of this sense is the recent decision on this unfortunate phone. By the way, they found themselves in an interesting, though highly risky situation. They lift up with "their" government, in addition to the government of the most powerful (for now) country in the world, and no government does not like. And as he does not like it ... things can come up with (PiS government is no exception, for it;). Eg. A more strictly enforce tax laws, environmental, import ... stick always find - and it could cost the company billions. And all dlatgo (now would be "an insult") that the company is very, very consciously taken this decision, sensing a rat and including the CHIC STYLE - "anti-establishment", anti-spy, any-violation-privacy, etc. Of course, it all kind of such anti beginning and ending at MASS aCTION - on fejsbuku, so the establishment can sleep peacefully, the times when the action on fejsbuku did wonders and lead to solutions to escape room problems that "could not be solved" - gone. No, but it does not matter are the facts, it is important to the perception of users who feel invigorating Telling rebellion, and supports them after their Elder Brother - Apple. I'm curious (attention, cynicism), if the company is to pay, ie. The wave and anti-high, and will erode very quickly. For now, Apple is increasing and on it goes, to the satisfaction of investors. Nb, it was also an insult at the company, but only from the point of view of morality, because from the point of view of investors, Apple should be applauded, if not cheers.

    Create any gates deprives the entire solution meaning and quintessential stock.

    I personally think that the manufacturer was right, and I'm on his side. And the fact that some services require the manufacturer to leave the security systems of any holes indicates the worst of these services and the progress in the development of civilization Orwellian.

    The first is the slogan that makes me less interested

    The second is the unpleasant, denunciatory tone and insinuating article.

    Is journalism is based on information or on throwing insults

    that "open confrontation Apple and image gain more."

    Apple could have, maybe not right but is it a reason to discredit a public company? Apple does not hate but it's my business. Forgive me, but it's hard for nuances when you have 5 lines to write.

    I want and I must point out that long passed me the desire to show his worth at the expense of malice against writers. If I criticize it means that I require from you more. I care more on the quality of journalism and not showing who knows better and adventures. Keep your level and do not be reduced to normal today.


    votre commentaire
  • XX

    ,, But colonialism ended in XIX century, changed only the face, but continues today! "Very good point - Poland will of ruling the country since 1989 has also been harnessed to postcolonial car, taking her belonging place a horse (for a total workhorse - but the ox did not fit into the car). Just as it has been since the middle of the XVI century, when we were suppliers of goods simple, but require huge amounts of labor? Does this mean that we have the moral right to kill the maximum number of Germans for example. Berlin metro? Because Germany is the main colonizer (there are even some who clearly talking about ,, condominium "... he, he.)? Is it because France is sucking capital out of our country (and does so at power), we have the right to liquidate up to a large randomly selected group of Frenchmen? Is it because they negatively judge the US policy of slaughter I first encountered American? I thought that speech ,, D. Cameron of Poles benefits Phishing "is racist insult - or should kill any number of Englishmen to repay him ,, humiliation"? But Islamism was and is jaknajbardziej directed against local rulers. Born in Egypt, he fought with sekularnymi governments Nasser took power after bakructwie (economic and political) and was aimed at the seizure of power and to introduce some version of the system based on Islam, but a whole lot smoother than the latest versions served by IS. This is only bin Laden, after the experiences of Afghan and successes supported and financed by the United States Mubarak in the extermination of Islamists (better not to ask what methods) first radicalized to reaching the writings of Ibn Tammiyi and jurisprudence Hanbalitów (version Wahhabi), and secondly he began to preach the need for " cut off the serpent's head "that the US, instead of tails - Middle East tyrants on the American leash. If I were spiskologiem I would be convinced that Washington performs his plans - overthrowing Saddam, Gaddafi and Assad.

    So match - a revolt against the rulers and their sponsors and making systemic upheaval.

     

    It was about the Nazis murdered MAXIMUM (preferably all) Jews and Roma. Then in the queue for steel depletion of the Slavs. In that Islamists they are similar to the Nazis: they is not about killing soldiers ,, Frankish "(which would be rational and sensible) - the terms of murder in a maximum of spectacular up large, randomly selected group of people - the non-Muslims.

    Not really. The Nazis were genocide ideology. Islamists. Yes, they kill in a spectacular, dramatic and provocative way up, but it is a means to intimidate both opponents and subjects, and not an end like a Nazi. I would recommend http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2015/nov/15/terrorists-isis

    Naming Islamism "Islamofascism" is nonsense propaganda aimed at first to cure spinal moral western społeczeńst, second demonization of the enemy, thirdly, convinced voters that they can not concede one iota, and that the ills of the blame Islamists can not be addressed in any other way except bombs.

    Is it because they negatively judge the US policy of slaughter I first encountered American?

    It depends on the chipset. Poles do not abstain from terrorism in the Russian zone in the years 1864 - 1914, szlachtując quite a few Russians, as well as in the years 1939-1945.


    votre commentaire
  • Despite rational arguments and out of similar circumstances (role of colonialism, neokolonialzm, though here I believe that much exaggerated, the effects of the creation of Israel, the devastating impact of the invasion of Iraq in 2003) finally come to completely different conclusions.

    You write: Islamism (Wahhabism, Salafism) is a revolution. The problem is that usually the revolution lies at the root of diagnosis: guilty misery is the king or his advisers, the bourgeoisie or ,, leftists "and according to these conclusions revolutionaries attempt (often physical) liquidation selected, which are considered harmful to groups of people. It is usually is a certain group of people. So much theory. Usually it degenerates into a mass murder like. Bolshevik Revolution. The only revolution, which in my opinion is connectivity described by you ,, Islamic revolution "is the National Socialist revolution in Germany. Its goal after liquidation ,, ",, traditional" (acc. Wzmiankowanej my diagnosis) was the extermination of enemies to the maximum extent other people. It was about the Nazis murdered MAXIMUM (preferably all) Jews and Roma. Then in the queue for steel depletion of the Slavs. In that Islamists are similar to the Nazis: they is not about killing soldiers ,, Frankish "(which would be rational and sensible) - the terms of murder in a maximum of spectacular up large, randomly selected group of people - the non-Muslims. And just like Nazism (Unlike the Bolsheviks, who, however, had a positive purpose ,, "- ,, creating a fair system," etc. cliches) Islamism is nihilism. He does not offer (unlike for example. Bolshevism) any real purpose. It has to implement, disturbed. irrational goals, phantasmagoria ,, pure Islam, "as he professed by you emphasize group of people (what else push 99% of Muslims are peace-loving people). Like Weltanschaung the NSDAP was only a reflection of the artistic and racist phantasmagoria Hitler. The question arises: how are we to defend themselves? Before Hitler, it was necessary to defend killing a lot of Germans - and also those of 99% ,, peace-loving ".

    The question is whether aid to these people (refugees ,, "), often hostile to our values ​​or total negującym it is worth the freedom WHICH WE WE ARE THE depriving. Is it because of your proverbial ,, 1%" (the bad guys - ,, revolutionaries'), we have to settle for surveillance of, monitoring, etc. Even the security procedures at airports are annoying enough. What's next: checks at train stations? subway stations? Bus stops? It can control every ,, olive guy, "but it will be racism, after all? If it has to be - I thank you for those ,, 99% "good - I prefer that they did not exist in Europe.


    votre commentaire
  • Apart from the "proscription lists" that can touch prominent, the rest of the population, a significant expects the so-called "normalization", close my opinion, normalization of the Czech Republic after year 68 .Of course with completely different pozycji.Tak as at that time, will also include a free people. who will create such a "Charter 2023" expecting victory.

    I have the impression that these tribal wars we are completely exotic to the outside world and completely uninteresting.

    The accumulation of global crises, you know what, do not produce because impulse awansującego geopolitical position of the country shifted from "crumple zones"

    Empire definitively zone Good and even does not rule out move to a different zone Empire in exchange for Iran, for example, shift to a zone ID.

    Bredzę.Ale just a little bit.

    Do not get excited seriousness or the expiry of the national war plemiennej.Raczej I think the Fourth Republic have time again spóżniła.Nie develop language wings. This need to reject everything that the other parties are proposing, because only we know how to arrange this country is a result of that, I think, that we do not learn to work in schools (tests to check) or at work. I see in organizations, people care only about this, that they have not assigned blame for something. The Darwinian struggle for survival without empathy for colleagues. Only in the family can still count on the collaboration, well then you know how the PSL and nepotism.

    You can not see on the horizon any matter on which a cross-party consensus would be possible. In parts of the most important is the ability to win the rhetorical dispute that "I was on top". Invalid style, and the ultimate impact on the state. Do you see that everything can still have some residual respect for politicians?

    I watch political discussions in other TV (BBC, ARD) and do not see such a memorable and such an ignore / insult / ridicule opponent. It's something like a cult where you can only fully accept the terms set by the leader, or leave. (1. "There will have no other gods before me").

    In terms of internal in shipments (at least some) a kind of dictatorship / cult (at the end of the boss keeps the money and decides about the letters), and the democratically voters decide only that "dictator" wants most. I see it in black


    votre commentaire
  • Congratulates one of the very few, deep analysis of our attitude to the problem of refugees. A few days ago I wrote to Gazeta Wyborcza comment exactly the same content, but not printed. I suppose in spite of serious human approach to refugees GW is too engagement marketing action Polish soldier in Karbala, which can be in its broader pronunciation compares to act on the island of Santo Domingo (now the Dominican Republic). Then, in the early nineteenth century by order of Napoleon tłumiliśmy rebellions of slaves. Despite this, many Poles (unlike the French) were allowed to stay and settle on the island - it was the gesture for decent behavior and not taking part in the massacres. Then Poland was not independent and the army had to obey orders issued in Paris. For the senseless and voluntary participation in the war in Iraq one of us settled and even attempted to do this, despite the fact that this scandal did not gave us any benefits and only contributed to the perception of Polish as a tool for shortsighted US policy and reduce the loan sympathy what we had on stage international. Nobody did, "mea culpa" for the introduction of psychosis carbide (Anthrax) where Saddam Hussein was hit Europe in 2002. Fruits of the war in Iraq and the Arab Spring are right now mature and Europe has a special reason to accept refugees from countries in which these two events affected. we are bound by the Geneva Convention to accept the refugees, we also dealt with issues of work and residence for foreigners (this year Poland will 500tys gave work permits to migrant workers). Parishes and local communities also report voluntarily willingness to accept refugees.

    The work of journalists is to identify the profile of refugees, the capacity of our communities to adopt them, how to seal the borders, the proposed changes in immigration policy and inform it of its readers. Instead

    The real problems are omitted in silence: tens of thousands of people breaking our laws fall on our territory without visas and required documents and authorities and EU officials to enforce existing laws instead prefer to teach (and sometimes threaten) their own communities. I think that is another important element in the process of alienation

    power.

    We are witnessing interesting the way propaganda war, the most comprehensive to date expression gave yesterday in "Die Welt" prof. Gross, abusing the Poles as no one ever have dared. We begin to have a worse press than IS.


    votre commentaire