This methodology is called ,, pedagogy of shame "(one of its main ,, priests" JT Gross, whose disgusting remarks made to a German newspaper revealed yesterday GW). ,, We should accept them 'cause ... They deserve because ...
As well we should be careful (and there are plenty of those in our country), that ,, we should be "from Germany and Austria and Russia for the occupation and destruction of war from Britain and France and the United States for treason in 1939 and 1945. The theory of guilt - because that colonial powers have created this problem - the artificial states in the Middle East (and in Africa) are quite well on the left side of the political spectrum. Just like ,, theory humiliation "of the Muslim world by Europeans. Both are quite ably exploited by the Islamic world. And what these countries have done to improve your status? What did to break its limitations? Nothing. Those who are fortunate enough to have oil money from the Middle Ages conserve at home (that's yet to be a claim as a finished oil), those who do not have it hold a grudge against the world. Symptomatic is the fate of Palestinians expelled by the Israelis in Palestine - in any country of settlement should not be made despite the 50? 60 years reside ,, his "everywhere they are strangers. I'm afraid that the Arabs (?) Muslims (?) Have problems of adaptation to the present. And it is possible a different approach - China experienced the humiliation and it is quite unique in history - a giant, extremely rich country, over the centuries which may be synonymous with progress was ransacked, incapacitated and flooded drugs by Europeans. The Chinese, however, have decided to erase this humiliation after the development work. They do not sit, do not talk ,, we should be. "
That's right - we took voluntary participation in the aggression on Iraq. But what did ,, enlightened "media at the time? Sometime in the good old days when archives were free policy could be checked as such. The Lord wrote on the subject. Is he shouted Mr. ,, Leszek Aleksander Kwasniewski Milerze and do not go that way. " Usually, the dominant view ,, may neo-imperialist expedition but this is a chance for a better Middle East "Like ,, enlightened" media enjoyed that Arab tyrants fall. So far fragile sukcesik be declared in Tunisia because in Egypt uniformed company had to take his face. And Libya, Yemen or Syria? I've heard a lot about Syryjczykach, Erytrejczykach, fugitives from Libya, or even Albania. But Iraqis do not remember.
I read about the war in Syria, where Kurds take part, the Government, Rebels and ISIS.
I read about Libya, where rebels took part, Gaddafi's forces, and if I remember correctly France.
But the fact is accept some of the responsibility.
Exactly approximately: 180/295180
This share was Polish troops in this war. Approximately 0.0006% of all troops.
This will give us some 74 immigrants.
(I take into account only the multiplicity of forces, as anyone has yet effectiveness is welcome)
And now a little more seriously: There are plenty of arguments against accepting immigrants, such as security of citizens. Referring to one of them and it selectively allows us to not only understand nothing obscures even more difficult matter. It is sad that so few people approach this responsibly According to Mr. theory most societies over the borders of Europe should be sent back to the US because they were the main Devastator fragile governance of the Middle East. But there's the social miserable ...
Merkel, Hollande Gauck is already so imbued political correctness that does not recognize the views of the citizens of their countries. For them, who does not like the rightist immigrant, skinhead and inheritor Goebbels as chancellor said visiting a refugee center. Only that, apart hundreds and hundreds of skinheads who welcome immigrants with bread and salt are tens of millions of people who look with concern at what is happening to their Europe. Europe is rich and safe not because the Europeans want, as demonstrators in Tunisia and Egypt, where it seemed that Islamic spring immediately bring prosperity, but became so after hundreds of years of hard work. It's time. A safe is also because the civilized his church.
So you are right. We do not want thousands of immigrants who open factories children on a pot of Europeans and later hundreds of mosques.
I do not know if you noticed, that Europe did not come any refugee from Syria. They arrive from Turkey, a Muslim country, where none of them could be exposed to view indecently dressed women. A flow even to Europe, but to Germany, because, as I heard on TV saying refugees from the train station in Budapest, "they just want to drive to Germany, because that's where'll get the better benefits". And that will be the compulsory division. Each of the Polish Republic, Hungary or Slovakia right back to Germany or Sweden.
The ill-fated truck was 8 women, 4 children and 59 men. Such ratios are the norm on pontoons. Can we also provide them with a European wife. No sex, indeed, is painful.
So we should do the Australian clothes - pick up, give food and water supplies and blow up on the beaches of Libya and Turkey.
But it seems to me that you think Europe, because it is rich should take half of Africa and the Middle East, circa 800 million people. Unfortunately, we have reached a time that you should be ashamed of rational things. Most of the countries with the opinion of the oases of prosperity, high socjalu, free housing, etc. Is beginning to have problems with excessive government deficit and the announcement to assist immigrants born native citizens rage generating increased popularity of nationalist movements. Just look like Bravik is a national hero in Norway and beyond. The reason for this is globalization taking a job that contributes to the reduction of budget revenues, which is the social should be financed. It is no coincidence goal of migration are the rich countries of the old EU, and those already pulled residues forces to meet the statutory obligations in relation to indigenous citizens. Hence such, and no other attitude towards immigrants.
Turkey - a total of a poor country, adopted a few million refugees. Poland, whose citizens were repeatedly supported, both those who were economic refugees and those who have emigrated for economic reasons can accept 2,000 people. The same - but different, however, probably, Poland, accepted 16,000 emigrants Greek communists who fled after the civil war. This group stayed under the age of 70, when most went back to Greece. I grew up with these people and it was really great to be action, these people grew up in this society and completely assimilated.
The current arguments, arouse deep disgust, even if it determines the belief that it wants the audience. In this particular case our political oszołomy of all sorts are unique match. New God's Chosen One tells a complete nonsense of the millions of Ukrainians who have been granted supposed to help. They forget that they carry the weight of poorly paid jobs with frequent - though it is not a rule degrading treatment. I saw the arrogant way in which it treats our border guards. Politicians wipe his mouth the Lord God, and odkurzają empty phrases about solidarity, but in the realm of facts boils down to the password fooled with this Brussels as much as possible, but it's best not to give anything in return. Please jump to Budapest to the station and hug a few to each other. We here in Poland, we have our chwilówki online problems and plenty of their own poverty, I would sooner said it was a shame for Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, dripping with gold, the United Arab Emirates or Qatar, where they do not know what money do - to them refugees from Syria to close , to profess the same religion.
Not that I was insensitive because I am sorry that these people have hard, but somewhere you have to draw the line to help strangers because he knows you, that could also help hundreds of millions of extremely poor people in Africa, probably some one billion Hindus and a half billion Chinese people - they all have very hard.